This website uses cookies for a better browsing experience.
If you agree to the use of cookies, please click the "Agree" button.
Please refer to the Privacy Policy regarding the use of cookies on this site.
Here is an example of retrofitting of an office building for vibration control.
A description of the property (wall-type dampers)
The Fuji Fire and Marine Insurance Building in Ginza
S and SRC construction, 10-story building with a basementWall-type damper48 units
Design | Kume Sekkei |
---|---|
Installation | Shimizu Corporation |


The Fuji Fire and Marine Insurance Building in Ginza
The Fuji Fire and Marine Insurance Building in Ginza is a 10-story steel office building that was constructed in 1974, and it was seismically evaluated right after the Southern Hyogo Prefecture Earthquake. Results indicated that the entire building lacked 5 to 23% of its horizontal load-bearing capacity along its shorter side. In order to meet current standards, its bearing capacity had to be increased and girders and column and girder connections had to be reinforced. With a steel building, however, increasing the load-bearing capacity of fireproofed clad girders and connections to the required level has been a difficult task.
Instead of reinforcing the structural members to increase their load-bearing capacity, a method of retrofitting to reduce the seismic response with wall-type dampers was used.
Four to eight wall-type dampers were installed on each floor, with an emphasis on balance to prevent eccentricity. The wall-type dampers were configured to perform so that the response of each floor is less than the horizontal load-bearing capacity in response to a seismic input with a maximum acceleration of 400 gals.

The Fuji Fire and Marine Insurance Building in Ginza
S and SRC construction, 10-story building with a basementWall-type damper48 units
Design: Kume Sekkei Installation: Shimizu Corporation
Evaluation results | The results of a study of the horizontal load-bearing capacity based on the current method of design indicated that the horizontal load-bearing capacity along the shorter side of the building fell short of the required level by up to about 20%. |
---|---|
Method of retrofitting | A steel frame with wall-type dampers attached was installed on the 3rd through 10th floors to reduce response, and steel columns were encased in concrete for reinforcement. |

Response acceleration

Shear force


Arrival of a wall-type damper

Installation of the wall-type damper

Completion